{"id":5802,"date":"2023-04-12T06:28:04","date_gmt":"2023-04-12T06:28:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/resade.org\/publication\/guide-for-conducting-a-literature-review-en-2\/"},"modified":"2023-04-12T06:28:04","modified_gmt":"2023-04-12T06:28:04","slug":"guide-for-conducting-a-literature-review-en-2","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/publication\/guide-for-conducting-a-literature-review-en-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Guide-for-conducting-a-literature-review-EN"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- openai-summary --><br \/>\nThis guide provides practical guidelines for conducting literature reviews, particularly rapid reviews, for those involved in healthcare policy dialogue. It describes five essential steps: formulate the research question using frameworks such as PESTLE, PICO, SPIDER or SPICE; search for publications in databases and grey sources (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, institutional sites); assess the quality of publications by checking validity, relevance, objectivity, timeliness and methodological rigor; combine publications by extracting data using a structured table (title, authors, year, location, objectives, type, key information) and organizing references with software such as Mendeley, Endnote Basic, Zotero; and finally contextualize and synthesize results to inform context-specific policy options. The document insists on good practices: clarifying the objective, involving knowledge users, searching in at least two databases, defining reproducible approaches for sorting and selection, using a second reviewer for verification and checking at least 10% of extractions. Narrative summaries are recommended, and results should be presented in a format accessible to decision-makers. A checklist lists critical tasks. Examples drawn from the Sub-Saharan African context serve as illustrations. The content is the responsibility of Results for Development, Duke, Feed the Children, Amref, Synergos, RAME, RESADE, CERRHUD and UHF. It also serves as a reminder that the quality of evidence must be assessed independently of the prestige of journals or the notoriety of international researchers.<br \/>\n<!-- \/openai-summary --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_seopress_titles_title":"Rapid review of health literature: a practical guide","_seopress_titles_desc":"Practical guidelines for conducting a rapid review of healthcare literature: steps, evaluation of sources, synthesis and recommendations for polished dialogue","_seopress_robots_index":"","_seopress_robots_follow":"","_seopress_robots_imageindex":"","_seopress_robots_snippet":"","_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_robots_breadcrumbs":"","_seopress_robots_freeze_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_custom_modified_date":"","_seopress_robots_canonical":"","_seopress_social_fb_title":"","_seopress_social_fb_desc":"","_seopress_social_fb_img":"","_seopress_social_fb_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_fb_img_height":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_title":"","_seopress_social_twitter_desc":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img":"","_seopress_social_twitter_img_attachment_id":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_width":0,"_seopress_social_twitter_img_height":0,"_seopress_redirections_value":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled":"","_seopress_redirections_enabled_regex":"","_seopress_redirections_logged_status":"","_seopress_redirections_param":"","_seopress_redirections_type":0,"_seopress_analysis_target_kw":"","_seopress_news_disabled":"","_seopress_video_disabled":"","_seopress_video":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas_manual":[],"_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable_all":"","_seopress_pro_rich_snippets_disable":[],"_seopress_pro_schemas":[],"footnotes":""},"auteur":[],"langue":[],"thematique":[224],"type-de-publication":[262],"class_list":["post-5802","publication","type-publication","status-publish","thematique-knowledge-management","type-de-publication-inclusive-political-dialogue"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/5802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/5802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"auteur","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/auteur?post=5802"},{"taxonomy":"langue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/langue?post=5802"},{"taxonomy":"thematique","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/thematique?post=5802"},{"taxonomy":"type-de-publication","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resade.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/type-de-publication?post=5802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}